Showing posts with label Hilary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hilary Clinton. Show all posts

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Still 'Clinton Crazy' after all these years, Philip Weiss touts Vince Foster conspiracy theory

Journalist Philip Weiss is touting an anti-Clinton conspiracy theory concerning the death of Clinton attorney Vince Foster which was widely promoted by the right during the Clinton administration. On his blog Mondoweiss: The War of Ideas in the Middle East (read here), Weiss promotes the idea that Foster was assassinated by a Clinton administration hit man to cover up the existence of a list of Clinton's past sexual peccadilloes which Foster purportedly had in his possession.

Those who are getting long of tooth will remember that this charge was among the many promulgated by the right during their Clinton era feeding frenzy. The allegations were thoroughly investigated by Special Prosecutor Ken Starr and found to be baseless; Vince Foster committed suicide. In spite of this finding, conservative media outlets such as Fox News, the Washington Times and American Spectator continued to promote the Foster assassination conspiracy theory. Sean Hannity continues to promote it on his Fox News program. (Read here.)

Weiss was motivated to dredge up this right-wing conspiracy theory having seen on television an interview of historian Taylor Branch concerning The Clinton Tapes, Branch's new book of Clinton interviews. Branch and his interviewer apparently mocked the Vince Foster conspiracy theories, thus getting on Weiss' fighting side.

This is not the first time Weiss has written about this subject, his having written an article concerning these conspiracy theories which was published in the New York Times Magazine back in 1997 (read here). Both that article and this new one deal with accusations by one Gary Parks, whose father, Jerry Parks, did security for the Clinton campaign's Little Rock headquarters during the 1992 presidential campaign.

Back in 1997, Weiss wrote of the senior Parks:

"He was a big man who is sometimes described as a bully, and in 1991 he contracted to provide private security for the Clinton campaign headquarters in Little Rock."
(Somehow, in the intervening years, Weiss has promoted Parks from security contractor to "Clinton aide".)

In 1993, Jerry Parks was gunned down gangland style as he drove in Little Rock. According to Weiss' Times article, Gary Parks was so upset by his fathers murder that he

"walked off his job as the ''go-to guy'' at a car dealership. Later, he told me, he ran a female escort service."

I'm not sure what a "go-to guy" is as a job title, but is Weiss saying that Gary Parks went from working as a used-car salesman to working as a pimp? (The euphemisms are flying fast and furious in Weiss' article, so my apologies to Mr. Parks if I'm reading the sentence incorrectly.) To shore up Parks' bona fides, however, Weiss informs us that Parks turned down big money from the National Enquirer for his story.

What is this story? In a nutshell, Gary Parks told Weiss, and Weiss believed, that Vince Foster was hired by Hilary Clinton to prepare for the Clintons' divorce. That divorce was planned by Hilary Clinton, Weiss writes, in her fury over Bill Clinton's decision not to seek the presidency in 1988. Weiss credulously reports Gary Parks' allegation that Foster's prep for the Clinton divorce included preparation of a Bill Clinton peccadilloes list, a job Parks claims his father was hired to do.

However, Weiss' article in the Times reveals several facts that indicate that this theory is far from bullet-proof. It says that Jerry Parks was no angel and that others had both motive and opportunity to kill him. It quotes the Little Rock homicide detective who investigated the case to the effect that Gary Parks had not one shred of evidence for his accusations. It also says of Gary Parks that he

"cooperated with the makers of a Clinton-bashing mail-order video. ''I feel that Bill Clinton had my father killed,'' Parks says on the tape, offering no evidence. Parks now feels he got carried away: ''I'm the first to admit some of the things I said on the video were wrong. I'd just come out of my trance. I don't think my head was completely back on straight.'' "

Weiss does not indicate whether Parks was paid for his appearance in the anti-Clinton video, and that gap in his reporting may get to the heart of the matter. He may not want to know. (He also doesn't identify the inaccurate statements Parks admitted to having made in that video, preferring to imply that there was a Clinton connection to Jerry Parks' killing, without actually saying what that connection might be.) However, he does admit that Parks made a career of sorts promoting this conspiracy theory for far-right, "militia types", who got Parks radio interviews around the country, set him up in a job at a Colorado ski resort, and arranged for a place for him to stay. All of this goes to a potential motive for Gary Parks to promote the conspiracy theory. Weiss' 1997 article goes on at great length about the radical far-right anti-government motivation of some of those who promoted this theory. We already know of the cynical, partisan motivation of mainstream Republicans who promoted it.

Somehow, all this seems to have slipped Philip Weiss' mind over the past 12 years. Now, not only is Gary Parks' version of Vince Foster's death plausible, the need to qualify Parks' claims with any facts which call his reliability into question has evaporated. Weiss cites anonymous sources in the passive voice to accuse Clinton -- like ghosts speaking through a medium's Ouija board -- and alludes to a cumulus cloud of vague charges.

"There have been suggestions that (Jerry) Parks was shaking people down with what he knew; and he came to a bad end. We are talking about a situation in which two Clinton aides [i.e. Parks and Foster] die of mysterious violent causes inside of 2 months. And the pattern is consistent with what Kathleen Willey experienced, Gennifer Flowers experienced, and Linda Tripp too: If you knew something about Bill Clinton’s sex life, that was dangerous information. No wonder there are guns in Primary Colors."

Philip Weiss is right. No wonder the entertaining, shallow, stereotype-laden novel by Joe Klein and the movie starring John Travolta had guns in them. The conspiracy theory must be true.

Weiss should refresh his memory a bit. He could start by remembering the title of his article about those whose theories he now touts. It was called "Clinton Crazies". He's become one of them.


Philip Weiss



Afterthought: Weiss has a longer, more involved history with the Vince Foster story than I was previously aware of. He not only wrote about it at the time , in the years since has blogged about it repeatedly. He's expressed some strong, sometimes contradictory emotions about the matter, showing that his motive may be based less on the facts of the case than on anti-Clinton bias. Strangely, he's also attacked Foster, the purported victim of the conspiracy, as "a rube ... with a huge superego". Weiss may not know much about Freudian psychoanalysis, but he knows what he doesn't like.

Check out what he wrote here about his confused personal feelings about this matter and tell me what on earth this guy can be thinking. He writes there of his motivation for believing in this conspiracy.
"I liked Gary Parks. I felt he was honest and smart. His assessment of Bill Clinton’s personality was the best I heard. He said if Bill Clinton had gone to bed with your sister and then screwed her over, and you were enraged with him, he could walk in the room and ten minutes later you’d have forgotten about it completely, he was that seductive."

By the way, maybe the question posed by this Daily Kos post provides a good subject for a Weiss follow-up: "Did Obama's Birth Certificate Kill Vince Foster?"

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

What does Giuliani have in common with CAIR?

Both want to impose blasphemy laws in the name of stopping "hate crimes".

Back in 1999, Rudy Giuliani asserted that the Brooklyn Museum, in their "Sensation" exhibit, committed a "hate crime" by displaying Chris Ofili's painting "The Holy Virgin Mary" which featured elephant dung as a design element. In response, Giuliani filed suit against the museum and witheld legally mandated city funding from it. After U.S. District Court Judge Nina Gershon ruled against him in no uncertain terms, Giuliani was forced to settle his lawsuit against the museum, after getting several months of press concerning the issue, which was in fact his true motivation. By the way, Hilary Clinton opposed Giuliani on constitutional grounds. (More here.) Although he wasn't honest about his motives, Giuliani was attempting to punish blasphemy in the name of preventing a "hate crime" against the Catholic community of New York.

In the Pace University Koran desecration case, CAIR, Pace University and its Muslim student associations, are doing essentially the same thing. (In this case, a student was charged with misdemeanor criminal mischief (vandalism), but the charges were then raised to felony level because they were defined as "hate crimes". He is subject, under these felony laws, to several years in prison if convicted.)

If desecrating a holy book or portraying saints in a way considered inappropriate were crimes, then that crime would be blasphemy, regardless of what other name is given. But blasphemy is not a crime in this country, and shouldn't be. That would run counter to the American system in which religion gets no special protection in the marketplace of ideas. The general public or a particular constituency may not approve of Koran desecration as a means of expression, but it is clearly protected speech. It is an act protected by another book -- the book the government is forbidden from desecrating by exceeding its authority and violating the rights of its citizens -- the Constitution. In this case, that would be the true desecration.

Check out what Eugene Volokh has to say: "The Perils of Hate Crime Laws". And read what Christopher Hitchens has to say about this and other instances where free speech (from the sublime, like Rushdie, to the ridiculous, like the Danish cartoons) is suppressed in the name of preventing "Islamophobia".

Let's leave blasphemy laws in the Middle Ages where they belong...

On Youtube... you can view a debate on this subject...

CONTACT

adamhollandblog [AT] gmail [DOT] com
http://www.wikio.com